I am pensive in my technique class today, in the warm sunset-orange room with the elegant triple-toned fileteado adorning the mirror. The same word is emblazoned there in red, white and satsuma colours as is embroidered on our teacher’s black T-shirt in scarlet writing adorned with paw prints, as though Biagi — the lazy, marmelade-striped genius loci of this place, who currently sits licking at a single, discarded ballet shoe — had autographed it personally. La Maleva it says: the bad girl. With her huge round 85% cocoa eyes, curly tendrils of black hair escaping from a loose bun and an earnest half-smile of persuasion, our teacher, however, looks less naughty than angelic.
Unusually, an online discussion is actually on my mind during class. The cybertalk has been of a strange species of tangueras, a species new to me — deftly precise of footwork, yet cold and sterile of heart; women with switched-off motors, like cats without a pur; vampiric, castrating, energy-draining succubi; devotees of a merciless technique god and scorners of the male sex; preying mantises of the dance floor; black widows who chew up leaders and spit them out at the end of the D’Arienzo tanda; creatures of a tango mirror universe where women want men to suffer, not enjoy, their dances with them.
Here in Buenos Aires, I often hear the parallel fiction — strangely similar — of dance floor goddesses and queens. “Don’t be so timid”, one of my male teachers always tells me, “don’t try not to bother the man. Bother me! Let me feel you, let me know you’re there! Use me for your pleasure! Come here and eat me alive!” They are two faces of the same card — the Ice Queen and the Fiery Princess; the debilitating vampire turning everything undead and the sexy red-lipped vamp. “She is a bitch”, I hear someone say of one of my favourite followers, in a tone of deep admiration: “a bitch of the dance.”
I look around and try, for a moment, to see my fellow female technique students through the eyes of myth. But the labels I try to affix curl and dogear back off as if I had literally tried to stick them to our skin, moistly sweaty in this muggy heat and resistant to adhesive. Every face in class is serious with concentration: many brows wear a tiny frown and a friend’s tongue protrudes a little from between her parted lips like a child’s in front of a reading primer. We walk through forward ochos, focusing on the instructions we have been given. I think about which part of my foot, in its pretty, girly heel, is bearing my weight. I visualise my back opening out, wide as a bat’s wings, twisting in a vertical plane, curling itself around the inside of an invisible oval of air. I feel my hips and instruct them sternly to stay relaxed, heavy and grounded.
There is a ghostly presence here in class: the leader. Despite counting several men — real-life leaders — among our classmates, our teacher speaks always of he and him, the absent partner, ever-present in spirit. “Dancing is about connection”, she tells us, uncurling her arms out to the sides and fanning her fingers through the air in a graceful, habitual gesture of hers which always reminds me of the fluttery arm movements of the corps de ballet in Swan Lake. “And connection is about touch and timing”, she specifies. This is what I feel when he leads me in the ocho; this is what I’d like him to feel; this is how the movement works, together, in the dance.
Each of us walks back and forth in our own little lane. My attention is so focused inward that I scarcely notice most of my classmates. But occasionally, in my peripheral vision I catch a glimpse of a beginner pivoting through the ocho in an awkward block with no attempt at dissociation (it take generally takes a little while for most students to grasp the concept well enough to even begin the long, difficult task of incorporating the corkscrew movements of our dance into their bodies). And, now and again, I glance at one of the more experienced followers twisting elastically through the movement with ease and grace. This is our training ground, our playing fields of Eton, our classroom, our university, our Oxbridge of the dance. The belle dame sans merci and the femme fatale are irrelevant fantasies: we are the readers, the literary critics here — not characters out of books.
If we have a symbolic representative, it is not Mata Hari or Marlene Dietrich. It is the girl here, in the navy-blue-and-white polka dot Comme Il Fauts. I remember how she felt as a recent arrival here in our southern city. I remember a slight stiffness of right arm, a heavy, intrusive head whose forehead pressed uncomfortably firmly against my own as I led her, a pair of hips which she twisted with over-eager speed as she felt an ocho lead, making it very difficult to differentiate between forward and back directions.
Of course, much of this could have been the result of my own considerable shortcomings as a leader and some of it probably was. But, in the skin-prickling heat and humidity, I remember snapping impatiently: look, don’t lean your head against me; don’t turn your hips so fast. And her shiny-eyed, smiling, open face remained seemingly free of either arrogance or apology and as fresh as if I had made a remark of singular genius or pointed out something she had never heard before. Yeah, you’re right, let’s see how I can work on it. She looked at me with the eager eyes of intellectual curiosity, as though her own body moving through the black-and-white space of La Maria were a fascinating object of study.
And now, a scant half year later, she is sensitive, responsive, twisty and delayed of hip, soft of forehead, relaxed of arm. There’s been no change in personality, of course, no alteration of psyche, no increased emotional, spiritual openness — that I specifically know of or can judge, at least. It’s just physical. It’s just technique. But the physical, to me, has its own dignity, its own beauty and its own meaning. It doesn’t need to borrow: neither from the language of psychoanalysis nor from the clichés of popular culture, nor from the Manichean portrait gallery of myth. What you feel in her embrace is the body as witness to patient months of practice. The body as work and study incorporated and transformed. A body shaped by service to the tango gods. And today I feel that I don’t need myths. That the physical can be richer and sweeter than the spiritual: more expressive and real. Bitches and goddesses, vampires and vamps, bad girls and whores are flimsy figments of our imaginations. I am much more interested in women as dancers.
